Print version (PDF)
From decuplets to anti-decuplets and quarks to pentaquarks
Prepared by E.S. Smith, K.H. Hicks and S. Stepanyan for the DNP
web page
Introduction
Dozens or even hundreds of protons and neutrons can combine to
form the known nuclei of atoms. But when it comes to putting quarks
together to form protons, neutrons or other particles, they only
come in packages of twos or threes. Or at least so it was thought
until recently. For over 30 years, physicists have searched for
exotic particles known as pentaquarks, that have a valence structure
of four quarks and one antiquark. In the fall of 2002, evidence
for a narrow baryon state having an exotic strangeness quantum
number, consistent with a pentaquark structure, was presented
at the PANIC conference [1]. Since then, many independent experiments
have confirmed the existence of this state.
So why is this an exciting discovery? In the simplest terms,
it tells us that the number of particles made from quarks is likely
to be much more than just the 3-quark baryons and quark-antiquark
mesons that are given in the textbooks. Furthermore, it may tell
us that there are symmetries present in solutions to non-pertubative
QCD that are not evident in the simple quark model. Evidence for
new mesons discovered at BaBar, Belle and CLEO also suggest that
the simple quark model is not adequate [2]. It may require a paradigm
shift for models of hadrons.
Symmetry properties have always played a significant role in
describing the spectrum of hadrons, and so it is not surprising
that they have had a central role in the recent discovery of pentaquarks.
In 1963, Ne'eman and Gell-Mann predicted the existence of the
Ω- consisting of three strange quarks based on
the SU(3) group theory for quarks [5,6]. The discovery of the
Ω- at Brookhaven [7] three years later was a
startling confirmation of the new quark model. At the heart of
this model is group theory, with the lowest mass spin 1/2 baryons
organized into an octet group and the spin 3/2 baryons (at higher
mass) organized into a decuplet group [3]. The prediction of pentaquarks
and subsequent experimental verification of their existence has
renewed the interest in how quarks are bound inside hadrons.

Figure 1: Pentaquarks are
expected to be members of an anti-decuplet group of particles.
This group is represented by plotting the strangeness of the particles
vs. the third component of isospin. The three corners of the triangle
(in red) are exotic, which means that their quantum numbers require
more than three quarks. The masses of the states are indicated
in parentheses after setting the mass of the Ω-
and Ξ5-- to the observed experimental
values [9].
Symmetry properties also led to the theoretical prediction of
the pentaquark. While baryons are made out of three quarks (qqq),
the pentaquark has a configuration qqqqq,
and hence will form a different theoretical group structure. The
lowest-mass pentaquark structure was known [4] to be an anti-decuplet,
which is triangular like the decuplet but pointing up instead
of down (see Fig.1). This anti-decuplet is predicted within the
chiral soliton model as an excitation of the usual low mass octet
and decuplet families. The symmetries of the model predicted,
with input from some experimental masses, the mass of a pentaquark
at 1.53 GeV and a decay width of only 0.015 GeV or less [9]. The
quantum numbers of this particle, called the Θ+,
requires two up quarks, two down quarks and one anti-strange quark
(ududs). The anti-strange quark
cannot annihilate with the other four quarks, and hence this particle
cannot be described by just three quarks.

Figure 2: Detection of
particles used to reconstruct the pentaquark state.
The Θ+ can be identified experimentally by its
unique strangeness quantum number. The anti-strange quark gives
the Θ+ a strangeness number of S=+1,
whereas conventional three-quark baryons (like the Λ with
uds quarks) have the opposite strangeness S=-1.
Also, the Θ+ has baryon number 1 since each quark
has baryon number +1/3 and the antiquark has baryon number -1/3.
The well-established principles of baryon number and strangeness
conservation allow experiments to pick out the mass spectra for
S=+1 final states, where no three-quark baryon can be
made. A narrow peak on top of a broad non-resonant background
signals the presence of a pentaquark resonance.
Experimental Evidence
The first experimental observation of the Θ+
state came from the LEPS collaboration working at the SPring-8
facility in Japan [10]. This experiment used a high-energy photon
beam incident on a carbon target producing the pentaquark state
in association with a K- particle. The Θ+
decays almost immediately into a neutron and a K+ as
indicated schematically in Figure 2. (This state can also decay
via Θ+→pK0.) The pentaquark
is identified as a peak in the invariant mass spectrum of its
decay products as shown in the bottom panel of Figure 3. The strangeness
of the Θ+ is determined using the charge of the
kaons in the reaction.

Figure 3: Invariant mass
of the nK+ system, which has strangeness S=+1,
showing a peak at a mass of about 1.54 GeV/c2. Top
panel: Data from the exclusive reaction on a deuterium target
from Jefferson Lab. Bottom panel: Data from the inclusive reaction
on a carbon target from SPring-8.
Confirmation of this result came quickly from other laboratories
around the world. To date there have been seven experimental observations
of a narrow exotic S=+1 baryon state at a mass of approximately
1.54 GeV [10,11,13-17]. The measured masses of the states are
shown in Figure 3. The exotic state has been observed in photon,
neutrino, and proton reactions with both nuclear and proton targets.
In the reactions that contain neutral kaons, these can be identified
using the KS→π+π-
decay, but these do not uniquely determine the strangeness. Both
of the θ+ decay modes have been observed, although not in the same
experiment, as indicated in Figure 2. The existence of this state
is given considerable support by its observation with different
probes and under very different experimental conditions.

Figure 4: The mass of the
Θ+ is given for each of the experimental observations.
The world average ±1 standard deviation is shown as a green
band [16]. On the right we give the reaction which was used for
the measurement with the Θ+ decay mode given
in parenthesis.
Photoproduction measurements of the Θ+ on both
deuteron and proton targets with the CLAS detector at Jefferson
Lab [12] has provided important confirmation for this exotic baryon
state and shed light on the production mechanisms which may be
responsible for its production. The measurement with a deuteron
target produced the Θ+ in the reaction γd→nK+K-p,
detecting all three charged particles, and reconstructed the neutron
using the missing-mass technique. The complete reconstruction
of the final state provided a way of reconstructing the Θ+
using just momentum and energy conservation. The mass spectra
for a S=+1 baryon final state is shown in the top panel
of Figure 3 along with the data from SPring-8.
The anti-decuplet family also contains two more exotic states,
denoted by Ξ5-- and Ξ5+,
which have S=-2 and charge Q=-2 and Q=+1,
respectively. The subscript "5'' indicates the five-quark
(pentaquark) nature of the states. The NA49 collaboration at CERN
has reported the only observation of the Ξ5--
at a mass of 1.86 GeV [18]. Clearly, confirmation of this new
particle is highly desired. The third exotic state, Ξ5+,
not yet observed, must be found at a mass close to that of the
Ξ5-- in order to tie down the three corners
of the anti-decuplet triangle.
Summary
In summary, evidence is mounting for the existence of an anti-decuplet
family of baryons with a valence structure of 5-quarks. However,
the properties of the Θ+ S=+1 state
such as spin, isospin and parity, still need to be determined
before it can be conclusively identified as a member of the JP=½+
anti-decuplet, and the single observation of the Ξ5--
cries out for confirmation. This new family of pentaquarks promises
to rewrite our understanding of baryon spectroscopy. The implications
of this discovery are being evaluated continuously in the literature
[19] and we can only expect more surprises in the near future.
Acknowledgements
The Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA) operates
the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility for the U.S.
Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-84ER40150. The support
of the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] T. Nakano et al., (The LEPS Collaboration)
Nucl. Phys. 721, 112 (2003).
[2] F. Close, Nature 424, 376 (2003).
[3] F. Halzen and A. Martin Quarks and Leptons: An Introductory
Course in Modern Particle Physics (New York: John Wiley &
Sons, 1985); D.H. Perkins Introduction to High Energy Physics
(Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, 2000).
[4] M Praszalowicz, Phys. Lett. B 575, 234 (2003) and references
therein [arXiv:hep-ph/0308114]
[5] Y. Ne'eman, Nucl. Phys. 26, 222 (1961).
[6] M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Rev. 125, 1067 (1962).
[7] V.E. Barnes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 204
(1964).
[8] Particle Data Group, Phys. Lett. 170B, 289 (1986).
[9] D. Diakonov, V. Petrov, and M. Polyakov, Z. Phys. A
359, 305 (1997); D. Diakonov and V. Petrov et al. [arXiv:hep-ph/0310212]
[10] T. Nakano et al., (The LEPS Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 012002 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ex/0301020]
[11] V.V. Barmin et al., (The DIANA Collaboration),
Phys. At. Nucl., 66, 1715 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ex/0304040]
[12] B.A. Mecking et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. A
503, 513 (2003).
[13] S. Stepanyan et al., (The CLAS Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 122002 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ex/0307018]
[14] J. Barth et al., (The SAPHIR Collaboration)
Phys. Lett. B572, 127 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ex/0307083]
[15] A.E. Asratyan et al., to be published in Phys.
Atom. Nuclei (2004) [arXiv:hep-ex/0309042]
[16] A. Airapetian et al., (The HERMES Collaboration)
[arXiv:hep-ex/0312044]
[17] V. Kubarovsky, et al., (The CLAS Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 032001 (2004) [arXiv:hep-ex/0311046]
[18] C. Alt et al., (The NA49 Collaboration) [arXiv:hep-ex/0310014]
[19] Updates to all work can be found in the presentations
to the Penta-Quark 2003 Workshop, JLab, Nov 6-8, 2003, www.jlab.org/intralab/calendar/archive03/pentaquark/program.html.
|